🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing group of states are exploring comparable measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a proposal lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is provided. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the step does not create binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," commented the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Charities have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the family of a girl who died after encountering dangerous online content contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to create tools that are appropriate and fit for children," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the local level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional time requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain politicians to follow this path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, other countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more cautious tone. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this international conversation continues, the steps of Australia and its followers show that governments globally are less and less willing to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.